Hi,
On Samstag, 25. Mai 2013, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> For example: after some intense studying, I now fully understand why
> declaring a new upstart job C that depends on existing jobs A and B
> ("start on job-a-did-its-thing AND job-b-did-its-thing") may prevent the
> start of job A (cf
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/964207). However, I
> still consider it confusing and at least questionable design that adding a
> new job can prevent an existing job from starting even though they do not
> conflict in any way.
WHAT?!? if that's true then I for sure know what I won't let near my systems!
That's rather horrible. Thanks for the info!
cheers,
Holger (writing this offline...)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.