[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#705285: ITP: jhelioviewer -- Visualization software for solar image



On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:52:02PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
> 
> * Package name    : jhelioviewer
>   Version         : 2.2.1
>   Upstream Author : Daniel Mueller
> * URL             : http://jhelioviewer.org
> * License         : MPL 1.1
>   Programming Lang: Java
>   Description     : Visualization software for solar image

This software looks very cool indeed!

> 
>  JHelioviewer is visualization software for solar image data based on the JPEG
>  2000 compression standard. JPEG 2000 offers many useful new features and has

Erm, JPEG? I don't care how it gets to my machine, just that I get
awesome images of the sun!

>  the potential to revolutionize the way high-resolution image data are
>  disseminated and analyzed. The JPEG 2000 Interactive Protocol (JPIP) enables
>  serving data in a highly compressed, quality-progressive,
>  region-of-interest-based stream. These features minimize the data volume
>  transmitted while maximizing its usability. This is especially relevant for
>  solar physics since NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory has started providing
>  more than a terabyte of image data per day.

I'd perhaps add more about the software it's self here, I'm interested
in using it -- sell it to me!

> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20130412135202.4796.44404.reportbug@lirispat.univ-lyon1.fr">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20130412135202.4796.44404.reportbug@lirispat.univ-lyon1.fr
> 

Cheers,
  Paul

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>
: :'  : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'`  4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
 `-     http://people.debian.org/~paultag

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: