On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:29:48AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I was thinking about a bit more automated way... ideally (in the long
> run) even that FTBFS (e.g. due to failed tests or some other arch
> specific quirks) would forbid automatic migration to wheezy etc --
> kinda full blown benefits from the Debian infrastructure without
> much of work from my side ;)
Did you check if the QA rebuilds try to, or could be asked to, build
arch:all packages? If so, it'd be a good start to routinely do
archive-wide rebuilds of arch:all packages as we routinely do rebuilds
of arch:any packages.
(Cc:-ing Lucas, for his great work on QA rebuilds.)
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences ...... http://upsilon.cc/zack ...... . . o
Debian Project Leader ....... @zack on identi.ca ....... o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature