Re: Release Update: Goals, Arches, Rolling, Removals
Am 13.08.2011 21:59, schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> * Neil McGovern <neilm@debian.org>, 2011-08-01, 22:07:
>> As noted in our previous mail [0DAY:DDA], bug #625449 has been opened
>> against developers-reference. This now seems to be drawing itself to a
>> conclusion. We would still welcome use of delayed queues where
>> appropriate, but this also formalises the policy over the previous few
>> years which allows DELAYED/0 for uploads fixing only release-critical
>> bugs older than 7 days, with no maintainer activity on the bug for
>> days and no indication that a fix is in progress.
>
> If you decide to NMU without delay a package maintained by me[0], please
> don't bother doing it, but orphan the package instead. I won't be
> interested in maintaining such a package anymore.
>
> [0] That is, with the Maintainer field set to me.
>
There is no need to be sulk. Debian wants to reach some quality and also
to finish release goals and NMUing is crucial to reach everything.
I don't think, that it is a problem, to react within seven days @ a bug
(RC bug in this case), or not? If not, why (except of VAC)?
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatthaei@debian.org
patrick@linux-dev.org
*/
Reply to:
- Prev by Date:
Re: Release Update: Goals, Arches, Rolling, Removals
- Next by Date:
Re: Release Update: Goals, Arches, Rolling, Removals
- Previous by thread:
Re: Release Update: Goals, Arches, Rolling, Removals
- Next by thread:
Re: Release Update: Goals, Arches, Rolling, Removals
- Index(es):