also sprach Thomas Koch <thomas@koch.ro> [2011.08.01.1914 +0200]: > So as a variation of the described workflow you can establish > a special branch that holds references to all feature branch > commits in its history. This comes about ¾ of the way to the history pollution done by TopGit. Not only would users potentially get confused by this additional branch (which is an implementation detail), it would also get in the way in gitk output (cf. pristine-tar) and annoy even the unconfused. I am currently investigating means to store information outside the worktree in an immutable and automatically tracked-and-shared way: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/178349 (msgid 20110801121946.GA575@fishbowl.rw.madduck.net) http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/178393 (msgid 20110801182015.GA3100@fishbowl.rw.madduck.net) Feedback welcome, of course. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems there is no place like ~
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)