On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:26:02AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > * Package name : dillo > > I remember asking for dillo to be removed due to the above, I'm glad > someone has had time to fix the issues. Is dillo v3.0 using GTK 3 or > GTK 2 with no deprecated code or just FLTK1.3? (I'm assuming dillo3 for > Debian would change the default build to not statically link FLTK.) > > How does the (unreleased) version compare with Arora (my current > candidate for "small but usable web browser") and how soon is it > likely to be ready for release? Arora is just a yet another interface for webkit; it takes over an order of magnitude more disk space than dillo+fltk, and I guess it has memory usage in that region as well. On the other hand, Dillo's support for CSS and such is sketchy at best. There's no javascript or anything of that kind as well. Another thing is, Arora is dead upstream and no one stepped in to revive it. -- 1KB // Yo momma uses IPv4!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature