Re: Bug#629278: ITP: python-sphinx-aafig -- Embedded ASCII art figures in Sphinx documentations
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Nicolas CANIART <nicolas@caniart.net> wrote:
> So is BOLA a DFSG compliant license or not ? Who is to decide ?
> If not, what should be done with BOLA licensed software packages in main ?
This has gone unanswered for a while, I wanted to voice my opinion on
the matter.
The decision comes ultimately to the FTP-Masters, that decide to
accept or not a package with a certain license. Even though the BOLA
license might be discouraged for new developments, it has already been
accepted for a couple of packages in Debian (darcsweb and libfiu) and
so I don't think it's useful to discuss if it should be accepted or
not, since it's already being accepted.
I'm working with Nicolas with the intention of sponsoring his package.
--
Besos,
Marga
Reply to: