Adam Borowski wrote: > perl-modules is exactly the same case as foo-data -> foo. I don't see why > it should be treated any different. No. IIRC already discusse ond -devel. 'perl-modules' contain arch:all Perl modules some of which depend on arch:any modules in 'perl' and vice-versa. Still can be resolvered by merging together (quite complex from packaging side but possible). -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature