[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#529974: RFP: rtmpdump -- download media streamed with the RTMP/RTMPE protocol



On Fr, Mai 28, 2010 at 22:49:43 (CEST), Ron Johnson wrote:

> On 05/28/2010 09:20 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Fr, Mai 28, 2010 at 16:00:27 (CEST), Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/28/2010 01:25 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>>> I'm going to package rtmpdump next week.
>>>>
>>>> On Fr, Mai 22, 2009 at 16:33:44 (CEST), Sam Morris wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> * Package name    : rtmpdump
>>>>> * URL             : [hidden obsolete url]
>>>>> * License         : GPL
>>>>>     Programming Lang: C++
>>>>>     Description     : download media streamed with the RTMP/RTMPE protocol
>>>>>
>>>>> A small dumper for media content streamed over the RTMP/RTMPE protocol.
>>>
>>> How will this be different from the rtmpdump (currently at v2.2d-0.0) in
>>> d-m.o?
>>
>> I didn't look inside the source package nor do I intend to do so. I note
>> that it doesn't provide an librtmp-dev package, so it's useless for me.
>
> Even when you need to reinvent the wheel, it's usually useful to see how
> others built their wheels, and maybe -- just maybe -- add to their
> well-debugged wheel.

not in this case.

>>>   Some rights-restricted libraries stripped out?
>>
>> I didn't spot any restricted libraries included. What are you referring to?
>>
>
> Christian created d-m.o for useful packages that can't be the official
> Debian repositories; mainly for licensing issues.

what licensing issues do you see in rtmpdump, ffmpeg or mplayer?! they
are all (L)GPL which is perfectly DFSG compatible. Before you come up
with FUD about patents, DMCA, etc. - pretty please don't. there is
already enough FUD floating around.

> That's why, for example, mplayer and ffmpeg are in both Debian and
> d-m.o.

please do your homework. you are evading my question, probably because
you have no idea what you are talking about.

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4


Reply to: