Re: Should ucf be of priority required?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 05:13:21PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Unless ucf is removed but not purged, right?
> Shouldn't the question rather be:
> When will ucf be merged into dpkg?
> I find is stupid that ucf handled configuration files will not be
> tracked by dpkg and that dpkg and ucf both implement a
> "keep/replace/merge/diff/whatever" interface for updates.
See http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/RoadMap .
Its already on the roadmap.