[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Conflicting information about buildd status and testing migration



Hi,

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 04:04:49PM +0000, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I agree that the page could be more informative, but it's due to the fact
> that it looks at the source package and does not get the information that
> it should build it.  In the database you can query on cimarosa.debian.org
> (if you're a DD) you will see that it says Installed-Version correctly:

That makes sense -- unfortunately I'm not a DD.

<snip>

> This suggests that it was tried on hppa tried long ago and failed.  (Building
> does only switch to something different depending on the buildd/sbuild version
> in use.)
> 
> On mipsel it seems that there is currently no unofficial autobuilder, so
> what I'd recommend you is to request a partial binary removal through
> ftp.debian.org's bug list to get it dropped for hppa and mipsel.

Ah, I see. Thanks a lot -- that made it clear.

Michael

-- 
GPG key:  1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de


Reply to: