Le lundi 29 juin 2009 à 23:30 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit : > On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:19:45 +0100 > Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> wrote: > > > gtk+extra2 will FTBFS as soon as the functions that will be removed in > > GTK+3.0 become deprecated in GTK+2.0. GTK+2.0 doesn't have to be > > removed from Debian for gtk+extra2 to break. Yes, that isn't how > > things *should* work and it isn't how other packages *do* work but > > gtkextra has been dead upstream for such a long time that bitrot has > > all but ensured that this will be the result. > > Let me clarify that a bit. > > As soon as you take Josselin's advice for preparing the rest of gtkada > for GTK3.0, you'll discover that nothing in gtkextra has been prepared > for what is *currently* deprecated in GTK+2.0. Fixing that will mean > completing the migration of gtk-extra2 through to current GTK+2.0 as > well as implementing the transition in gtkada. This is why I cannot > implement Josselin's advice in quicklist - it shows up the breakage in > gtk-extra2. I think you misunderstood my email. What is currently deprecated in GTK+ 2.0 *is* what will disappear in GTK+ 3.0. But deprecated doesn’t mean the functions will disappear. All the current GTK+ 2.0 API will remain available until we remove gtk+2.0 from the archive, even deprecated functions. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=