Re: BTS and the missing 'invalid' tag
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> Also, I don't think usertag covers this need. It's not a standard,
> and I guess* 'invalid' situations are so common which should deserve
> something more consistent (useful for statistics, searches/filters
> etc).
In order for me to bother to add another tag,[1] people need to
demonstrate repeated use of the tag as a usertag along with a specific
rationale to go along with the tag. Further discussion is perfectly
fine, but I'm personally much more convinced by action.
Don Armstrong
1: At least, for tags that I'm not immediately convinced of their
utility, anyway.
--
It seems intuitively obvious to me, which means that it might be wrong
-- Chris Torek
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: