Le vendredi 19 juin 2009 à 10:55 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > > It’s already better, but for more readability, would it be possible to > > have a registered list of bug tracking aliases? For example: > > Bug-Debian: #12345 > > Bug-Ubuntu: #2356 > > Bug-GNOME: #5671 > > It should be possible. I see one problem here though. Bug-Gnome is really > "Bug" because it's the upstream bug. While we can have an URL mapping for > each vendor, it's not possible for the non-qualified entry used for the > upstream case. I don’t think one of these entries should be qualified as “the” canonical upstream bug. When I forward a bug to epiphany, if I add a Bug: pointing to GNOME, later it can be forwarded by them to Mozilla/Webkit because the patch turns out to be a workaround for a bug in the engine. That would make suddenly the Bug field turn into a Bug-GNOME, and a new Bug field would be introduced, pointing to Mozilla/Webkit? I think it’s bad design to rely on too much expectations based on a particular case. The only thing that’s generic is that patches are related to bugs that can lie in various trackers. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=