[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#531221: okular: Arbitrarily enforces DRM



Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2009-05-31 09:05:10, schrieb John Goerzen:
>> Could you share your reasoning with us, specifically why you don't like
>> each of the four options I mentioned?  (Reproduced below)
>>
>> 1) Remove the DRM feature entirely
> 
> And IF proples want o knoiw, whether a PDF was DRM'ed?
> 
>> 2) Patch the default to have it disabled
> 
> This let peoples in the assumption, the PDF can legaly copied even if it
> is not

This has nothing to do with that.  This is a bit flag, and has nothing
to do with the legality of copying some or all of the PDF.  It is
*always* legal, in the United States at least, to excerpt small parts of
a document.  This holds whether or not the author set this flag.  It
holds whether you copied and pasted, retyped, or photocopied.

Also, I think it is silly to assert that it would ever be illegal to run
cp on a PDF on one's own disk.  If it's legal to cp it, then it is legal
to convert it to text format.

-- John


Reply to: