All'incirca Tue, 06 May 2008 19:14:26 +0200, Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org> sembrerebbe aver scritto: > > And moreover, I am afraid that sunpinyin-{le,ge}-data are not > > architecture neutral. So is it okay to make these two packages > > Arch:all? > > Yes. I'm not involved in sunpinyin, but out of curiosity: is the source package able to build both the little endian and big endian -data binary packages on the same architecture or are them completely different source packages? For what I know it isn't possible to build some of the binary independent packages on a certain architecture and the others on another architecture, as the binary packages listed in debian/control can't be changed dynamically during the build process, isn't it? Thank you, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani <g.mascellani@gmail.com> Pisa, Italy Web: http://giomasce.altervista.org SIP: g.mascellani@ekiga.net Jabber: g.mascellani@jabber.org / giovanni@elabor.homelinux.org GPG: 0x5F1FBF70 (FP: 1EB6 3D43 E201 4DDF 67BD 003F FCB0 BB5C 5F1F BF70)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature