Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
* From: Steve Langasek
* Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 03:34:59 -0700
[]
> FWIW, in the prototyping I did in the unixodbc package I made the symbol
> version and the symbol name two separate fields separated by whitespace,
> because this made it easier to generate files of this format with objdump -T
> and a little bit of shell. Dunno if you consider that a relevant advantage,
> but it does seem unnecessary to me to store the symbol names in a different
> format than that returned by objdump (given that you need objdump, not nm,
> to get the version of any undefined symbols referenced by an object).
Just as better alternative IMHO, please consider using `eu-readelf -ds`
from elfutils.
____
Reply to:
- References:
- Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>