Re: Archive architecture qualification

To: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Archive architecture qualification
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:57:53 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060102155753.GA27917@bode.aurel32.net>
Mail-followup-to: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060101075824.GA25457@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20051228173243.GA27270@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 20060101075824.GA25457@localhost.localdomain>

On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 05:58:24PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Possibly doing it on the wiki at a page named something like :
> 
>   http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/kfreebsd-i386
> 
> would be a good way to go.

The page is in place for kfreebsd-i386.

Bye,
Aurelien

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Archive architecture qualification
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: No 2.6 kernels for 586 in Sarge and up
Next by Date: Re: How to Increase Contributions from Volunteers
Previous by thread: Re: Archive architecture qualification
Next by thread: Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread