Re: /run vs. /lib/run

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /run vs. /lib/run
From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:17:25 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1135027045.27229.14.camel@arrakis.localnet>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 43A70625.1080902@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 43A70625.1080902@yahoo.co.uk>

Le lundi 19 décembre 2005 à 20:12 +0100, Thomas Hood a écrit :
> Any other defenders of /lib/run?  Of /run?

Please go ahead with /run. This has to the right place as no other
proposed location makes sense.
-- 
 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `'                        joss@debian.org
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /run vs. /lib/run
  - From: Eric Dorland <eric@debian.org>

References:
- /run vs. /lib/run
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: switching to vim-tiny for standard vi?
Next by Date: Bug#344073: ITP: libfile-path-expand-perl -- expand user directories in filenames
Previous by thread: Re: /run vs. /lib/run
Next by thread: Re: /run vs. /lib/run
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread