Re: vancouver revisited

[Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com>]

On 8/23/05, Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de> wrote:
> In article <[🔎] dedhpf$vgs$1@sea.gmane.org> you wrote:
> > The number of buildds required to keep up with the
> > volume of uploaded packages must not be greater than two.
> > There must be that many buildds, in addition there must also be  a redundant
> > buildd.
> 
> This means 2 or 3?

No, it says at most 2 buildds must be able to keep up by themselves.
And that at least 1 extra buildd must be available.

So it's >= 2.

BTW, please check the net-tools thread. :)