Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience)

[Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>]

[Marco d'Itri]
> I'm sure that a fair number of critical scripts (e.g. some dealing
> with networking) are not.

Yeah, me too.  I've seen incorrect init.d ordering several times.  And
to be able to detect and fix incorrect boot order, we need to know
dependencies.  I hope as many as possible will add dependency
information using the LSB init.d headers.  I've started doing it with
my packages.  After all, it can not hurt to document expectations, and
the headers can be used by any implementation so it is not tied to a
given approach.