Re: arch, svn, cvs
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 08:57:06PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Christoph Hellwig:
>>
>> >> Greg Hudson contributes an interesting viewpoint:
>> >>
>> >> <http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/thoughts/bitkeeper.whynot>
>> >
>> > It's completely unfounded bullshit. Whether you prefer a pyramid
>> > or lots of commiters style organization is pretty much a personal
>> > or rather community organizational issue. Both have their up-
>> > and downsides.
>>
>> Of course, but if I look at Linux release management (which is still
>> somewhat problematic, as countless vendor-specific patches can attest)
>> and cursory pre-integration peer review, I think he has a point.
>
> While I agree that Linus is a very bad release manager that doesn't have
> anything to do with the developmen model.
And that makes Greg's article "completely unfounded bullshit"? Sounds
like a foundation already: a bad release manager chose a pyramidal
model. That's the beginnings of a good inductive argument. Then we
add the other foundation he gives: here's a bunch of well-managed
projects, which use a non-pyramidal scheme.
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: Luciano Bello <luciano@linux.org.ar>
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@familiasanchez.net>
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
- arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)
- From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>