On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 20:36 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > 1) What's the timeframe? Should it be available for Sarge, so it needs > > > quick packaging? [...] > Uh, I don't care how quickly you package it, we're not promoting a totally > new package from unstable to stable in the space of a week. Sorry. Err, my wording was wrong. I meant prepare it to run in a Sarge environment or not. But I do not want it to be official either, but as an add-on from an unofficial apt-repository. Btw, it will need ftp-masters approval even, as it will be a new package, then more tests, bugreports to fix, etc; no way for official support in Sarge, I know it. Sorry for the confusion, Laszlo/GCS
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part