On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:46:25PM +0100, Brett Parker wrote: > > I imagine that's a pretty simple change I should just do myself. > > Erm, dchroot already does this. likewise, i'm not sure what this sid package would do that dchroot does not. > (I've got an amd64 with bind mounted home, an i386 chroot, an i386 > testing chroot and an ubuntu hoary chroot, I've also got pbuilder setup > to build for i386, which is much nicer than building in a (potentially) > unclean chroot). i've been very happy with dchroot, i have a whole farm of chroots under /srv that i use frequently for building on combinations of architectures and releases. i even have a chroot to play my favorite 32-bit windows games via cedega. sean --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature