also sprach Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> [2005.03.17.1827 +0100]: > * martin f krafft (madduck@debian.org) [050317 17:10]: > > Why can't we have separate sid->testing propagation for each arch, > > then freeze testing as before, get rid of RC bugs, and release? > > Because than the security team may need to fix 11 different source > packages (or how many architectures we actually release) instead > of 1. This is a good point, but I wonder whether it should remain a show-stopper. Wouldn't the logical solution be to stock up the security team? That said, the chance of a package going out of sync on more than a few architectures is minimal, so even though your speculation is correct, it's likely not going to be in effect ever. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature