El dom, 09-05-2004 a las 17:30, +0200, Marco d'Itri escribió: > On May 09, Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote: > > > Those who still do not see the need to make the lists closed for non > > subscribers or non registered people (via the whitelist), please > > propose a better solution. > Start using DNSBLs like SBL, XBL and DSBL, or have Blars Blarson try on > murphy the same recipes he uses to filter spam in the BTS. BlackLists are NOT an option, they should be killed because they are maintained incorrectly. Here in Spain some people does SPAM from ADSL connections and thus from time to time one of those black lists add ALL ADSL connections to the list and we cannot send mail to some places from our own mail server (some ADSL connections have static IP address and our ISP lets us setup our own MTA if we want). I'm not a spammer but since two or three years ago I was added to three or four lists of spammers and it's not a trivial task to be removed from them. > > Or at least the listmasters should block the spam sources which are > reported to them week after week. > That's a better solution also, a good spamassassin with some feedback could help. I think Santiago said here some months ago that the Debian' Spam daemon was not working correctly, perhaps it's only a matter of fix it. Cheers. > -- > ciao, | > Marco | [6183 soylJ5l/XYEwA] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > -- Carlos Perelló Marín Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC) Linux Registered User #121232 mailto:carlos@pemas.net || mailto:carlos@gnome.org http://carlos.pemas.net Valencia - Spain
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente