Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> Then why does it talk about Enhances?
>
> Because a) the practice exists, b) any package can use Exists
> without breaking anything, and convey information to the user, and c)
> it emphasizes what I said above.
And when the dpkg(and other) tools implement enhances in a way that compatible
with existing uses of it, then it will have been policy's fault for suggesting
the use of enhances, without any implementation to point to.
Reply to:
- References:
- rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
- From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
- From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
- From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
- From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>