On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:59:43AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:07:21AM +0100, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote: > > And why don't you use testing, instead? It's precisely for people like > > you, that want to be more or less updated but without being exposed to the > > possible problems of sid. > > Lack of automated security updates. Most security fixes get in to sid > pretty fast, requiriring minimal manual intervention. See the old > flamewars. Do I get you right? You're running testing/unstable on critical boxes that require timely security fixes? Well, you're at your own risk. 8-O . Siggy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature