On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:55:20AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:23:45PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:10:01AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:48:36PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > Direct write access seems quite reasonable, but I've seen a number of > > > > messages from d-i package maintainers (and others) on debian-boot saying > > > > "your translation has the wrong encoding, I've fixed it". This is why I > > > > said elsewhere in this thread that I think direct commit access for > > > > translators is reasonable as long as a maintainer, or somebody taking on > > > > that role, is responsible for the upload. > > > > > > And I replied that with Dominique's proposal, someone will have to build > > > those l10n packages, so these errors will be caught as well. > > They will definitely not catch all the errors I've caught in the past. > > Sorry. > *This* is laughable. Why? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature