Le vendredi 17 septembre 2004 à 13:11 -0500, Branden Robinson a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 05:03:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> writes:
> >
> > > Most of them, actually. And there's no reason why the others should
> > > support such a non-standard header. It should be X-Mail-Followup-To, to
> > > begin with.
> >
> > Not in the RFC 2822 era. The "X-" business was removed.
>
> It's been three days now, and I'm still waiting for Josselin's next
> contrived excuse for not abiding by the mailing list code of conduct. :)
Sorry to mhave you waiting. However, shouldn't you be showing the RFC
explaining the meaning of "Mail-Followup-To" to the developers of MUAs
so that they can implement it at once?
--
Josselin Mouette /\./\
pouet
pouet
« Sans puissance, la maîtrise n'est rien. »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=