Hi, Joey Hess: > I assume it's RC because there is a package that needs to build-depend > on both? So far I've found it to be annoying, because I have to swap > libraries in and out while compiling different things, but not RC. > I´m playing with ideas for a text-mode-windowed status display for Asterisk. Newt would be the ideal candidate because I´d be able to incorporate part of the zapata utilities (drivers for analog phone interfaces) which are already using it. I´d like to be able to actually *build* (and use, of course) that program on Sarge... Besides, isn´t it a requirement to be able to install all of Debian simultaneously? (Excluding intentional conflicts:, of course.) > > Question: Does it make sense for a -dev package in general, or (at > > least) aalib1-dev or libnewt-dev, to depend on slang-utf8-dev|slang-dev? > > ITYM slang1-utf8-dev. No, it won't work. See bug #140808. > Ah. Silly me, forgetting to search archived bugs. :-/ > > If not, should there be a separate libnewt-utf8-dev package? If not, > > might it be possible to have aalib1-dev use slang-utf8-dev? If neither, > > how should this be resolved? > > I've not found a way to accomidate the slang-utf8 ABI change in aalib > without also changing aalib's soname, but I've not tried very hard. So where do we go from here? The no-brainer solution seems to be to create a newt-nonutf8 package, but that´s *ugly*. -- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature