Re: Best pratices for short descriptions
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Best pratices for short descriptions
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:43:50 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20031204184350.GD22638@deadbeast.net>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87ptfbmrmw.fsf@florent.maison>
- References: <E1AKgVK-0000Xy-00@wr-linux02> <1069355467.12122.93.camel@pisces.woot.net> <Pine.LNX.4.56.0311211125580.8081@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de> <1069425165.13969.44.camel@pisces.woot.net> <871xs1d57g.fsf@florent.maison> <1069774031.16053.25.camel@pisces.woot.net> <87k75om4hb.fsf_-_@florent.maison> <1070065876.16050.153.camel@pisces.woot.net> <87ptfbmrmw.fsf@florent.maison>
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 10:49:11AM +0100, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Yes. Now, you have the problem that Policy maintainers want
> implementation prior to the rule appearing in Policy and some people
> won't follow rules unless they are stated in Policy (or are themselves
> convinced that the rule is good).
Welcome to the Debian Project.
--
G. Branden Robinson | Humor is a rubber sword - it allows
Debian GNU/Linux | you to make a point without drawing
branden@debian.org | blood.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Mary Hirsch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: