Re: Changes in t1lib.

["Artur R. Czechowski" <arturcz@hell.pl>]

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:35:55PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> If you're renaming them anyway, why not follow Policy 8.1 and
> s/t1lib/libt1-/ (yielding libt1-1, etc.)?
Yes, I thought about it. But there is no strict rule in Policy, just
recommendation. There are many other packages which do not conform to 8.1,
like: e2fslibs, svgalib, zlib, imlib, aalib, beecrypt, slang, cracklib...
Should I go on?

And last but not least: upstream name is t1lib. I do not like to change it
until it is really needed.

OTOH, if you provide me good arguments why I should change name of t1lib,
and good explanation why a new package, let's say rsplib, does not conform
to this rule, I will not insist anymore.

Regards
	Artur
-- 
Z biegiem czasu historia nabiera procentów
                                       /Gosia/