[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Package which uses jam (instead make)



On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:07:02 +0100, Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr> said: 

> On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 08:37:25AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>> > 	Bzzzt. It is documented to be a Makefile. That _is_ the
>> >  interface definition.
>>
>> Out of curiosity, could you define "Makefile"? The standard I know
>> of for Makefiles is at:
>> <http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/utilities/make.html>
>> Is that the standard Policy refers to?

> Given the earliest copyright of 2001, that's quite definitely not
> something the original writer referenced :)

	The single UNIX spec that is referred to above is a derivation
 of the POSIX spec, which far predates the Debian policy (it also
 predates Linux, but that is besides the point).

	manoj
-- 
Get in touch with your feelings of hostility against the dying
light. Dylan Thomas [paraphrased periphrastically]
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: