On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:31:40PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 08:54:14PM +0200, Pedro Larroy wrote: > > Next time, be more positive. Thanks. > > He's offering constructive criticism, pointing out that there could be > better examples, and instead of saying "thanks!" and using it to improve > the document, you attack him. > > He's not the one that needs to be more positive. [The following text is ENCRYPTED! You only have license to DECRYPT it if you promise not to interpret its contents as anything but a wry joke. And if you do take it seriously, I will sue you under the DMCA! So there!] Abgr Ze. Yneebl'f rznvy nqqerff naq pebff-ersrerapr gung jvgu gur gbar bs zrffntrf frag gb bgure Qrovna yvfgf erpragyl, fhpu nf qrovna-yrtny. Nyfb, fubhyqa'g gur qbphzrag or pnyyrq gur TAH/Yvahk Nqinaprq Ebhgvat naq Genssvp Pbageby UBJGB? ;-) -- G. Branden Robinson | Sometimes, getting your patch in is Debian GNU/Linux | just a matter of waiting for branden@debian.org | somebody else to reimplement it. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Jonathan Corbet
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature