[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: search-citeseer_0.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED



Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no> wrote:

> * Peter S Galbraith 
> 
> | AFAIK, you need to depend on emacs itself (and not emacs-common) if you
> | byte-compile it.  I _think_ stuff can break if you don't, but I'm vague
> | on why.  Search the debian-emacsen archives.  I split off a package
> | because of that issue a while back, but the seperate -el package is 62KB.
> 
> I don't think you need to, because of the way emacsen have their
> post-inst-hooks where all the packages which can be used with them are
> byte-compiled.

I found it:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-emacsen/2002/debian-emacsen-200202/msg00041.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-emacsen/2002/debian-emacsen-200202/msg00050.html

and:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/debian-emacs-policy

  D) Each add-on package must declare relevant dependencies on other
     packages (including other add-on packages).  Note that add-on
     packages should not depend on emacsen-common directly, but rather
     on either the virtual package "emacsen" (see below), or some
     appropriate combination of flavors (i.e. Depends: emacs21 |
     emacs10).

>                 And as you write below, byte-compiling a 4k file is
> probably not worth the effort.

That's what I think anyway.

Peter



Reply to: