Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 09:24:14AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Glenn Maynard <g_deb@zewt.org> [2003-04-23 03:30]:
> > If someone missed a meeting because a program they installed out of
> > Debian had a time bomb in it, they would be justified in questioning
> > their use of Debian, not just the application.
>
> No. They would be justified in questioning their opinion in their
> usage of _un_stable for critical services without a clue about what to
> do in such a case (like keeping former version (dpkg-repack) or taking a
> look at <http://snapshot.debian.net/> for older packages).
>
> There were _bader_ breakages in unstable than a single application.
>
> People depending on services on the one hand and using unstable on the
> other hand should never blame the project for anything.
>
> Get a clue if you plan to live with unstable.
English is apparently not your native language, so I'll just point out
that "get a clue" is extremely rude and assume it was unintentional.
I'd suggest that you go find out what really happened before posting
further.
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to: