On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 01:37:04PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote: > Hmm... I'd argue for putting the split at either 386 vs 486+ (the latter > at least has a math copro and CMPXCHG), or at 386-pentium vs 686+. See the beginning of this thread; the problem is that libstdc++ has drawn a line between 386 and 486. -- - mdz