Matthew Danish wrote:
> Yes; it is the Common Lisp packages which have a coordinated controller
> system. However, Lam and I agreed to change the proposal to
> ``debian-common-lisp'' instead, because ``debian-lisp'' could be
> construed for other Lisp dialects.
I'm happy with either debian-common-lisp or debian-lisp. Given the
relativley smaller number of people using non-CL lisps, I expect the
the non-CL lisp traffic on a debian-lisp list would not interfer with
efficient CL discussions.
In either case, I think the list will be well-used to the benefit of
Debian and its users and I continue to strongly support this
proposal. I suppose if I had to choose between the two, I'd lean
towards debian-common-lisp but would be glad to have a debian-lisp
list with other non-CL users.
--
Kevin Rosenberg | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
http://b9.com/debian.html | : :' : The universal
GPG signed and encrypted | `. `' Operating System
messages accepted. | `- http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
pgpY4AM7jN00Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature