Hi Marco and all others! On 2003-12-14 3:01 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 13, Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote: > > >I would propose to handle this similarily to the devpts > >filesystem i.e. by a init-script instead of cluttering fstab. > Agreed. This also solves the problem of ugly messages at boot when > booting a 2.4 kernel. I agree, too. > udev (and given time many other programs) needs sysfs mounted, so we > should decide if it will be handled by devpts.sh or by a similar script > in a different package. > Currently the udev init script[1] mounts it by itself, but I'd like to > remove this code and assume that something else already did it. IMHO it does not really belong to devpts, libsysfs seems to be a more appropriate place. Of course I don't insist of it, it's just a matter of style... Marco, do you plan to use the dynamic library of libsysfs for udev? If so, you have to depend on libsysfs0 anyway and the /sys problem is solved. If you want to keep linking the static library for some reason then there may be a different solution. What do you think? Have a nice day! Martin -- Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer martin@piware.de mpitt@debian.org http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature