Le lun 25/08/2003 à 21:22, Mark Howard a écrit : > Should we have another measure for when packages are releasable in > addition to RC bugs. For example, does having >100 minor bugs means that a > package is unsuitable for stable? > I know the default answer is that it's the package maintainer's decision > - but I don't know what to decide! Also, saying <200 non-RC bugs might > be a useful QA metric. That doesn't mean much. A small package may have large usability problems with 2 or 3 normal bugs, while 200 bugs in XFree won't make it unsuitable for stable. I guess that's why it's up to the maintainer. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=