Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)

To: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:50:21 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021115085021.GC9063@dat.etsit.upm.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1037271478.29863.16.camel@localhost>
References: <[🔎] 1037271478.29863.16.camel@localhost>

On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:57:59AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > I'm surprised at the amount of people that don't read
> > the mails throughly and comment on issues that have
> > been beaten to death before.
> 
> Yes, it's a shame that not everyone is omniscient, or
> even polite for that matter.
> 

Sorry I apologize for my rudeness. I'm ticked off due to the fact that I
wanted us to advance forward and this discussion is mainly going round and
round and round and round .....

Sorry again :)

Javi

Attachment: pgpv9oeffSzTy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

References:
- Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
Next by Date: Re: A Round of Removals (past tense)
Previous by thread: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
Next by thread: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread