On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > Hmm... looking at the bug and the proposed patch, Osamu's problem > seems to be that he wants to make a session-manager-less session the > default on the system (that is, REALSTARTUP ends up being > x-window-manager _even_ if x-session-manager exists). Sounds a lot > like local configuration policy being forced upon every Debian > installation. Well, tell it to Eduard Bloch, who also wants every Debian system in the world to work the way his does. I'm tired of the sniping, so I want to work with other package maintainers to come up with a consensus so that the irrational personal attacks will be revealed for what they are. > I am probably to blame for this. Back when I was maintaining wdm I > remember there was some silly thing regarding the list of window > managers in the window manager selection box which was implemented by > some hack in a copy of the default Xsession script. Since then > Xsession has been split in lots of little tiny bits (and that's A Good > Thing(TM)). I don't know what wdm is doing nowadays, but if it isn't > using the default Xsession script for some reason, the problem should > be fixed. Well, hopefully the current wdm maintainer is reading this. > Just name an OPN channel and a date, and I'll see if I can make it > there. My network connection nowadays sucks, but I can try... There was a time when it didn't suck? :) I fondly recall the endless ping timeouts from m2. :) Let's see what other folks say. -- G. Branden Robinson | Kissing girls is a goodness. It is Debian GNU/Linux | a growing closer. It beats the branden@debian.org | hell out of card games. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
Attachment:
pgpEnTnbV8IgX.pgp
Description: PGP signature