Re: [HELP] Bug#167049: FTBFS: debian-reference
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 05:59:14PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
> Subject: [HELP] Bug#167049: FTBFS: debian-reference
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:39:05 -0800
>
> > Hi, I need help.
>
> > Problem reported is something to do with one of the TEX components in
> > unstable/testing. Can anyone points me to the right package to reassign
> > this bug to that package?
> >
> > My local solution was to manually create: /var/spool/texmf/tfm/jknappen/ec/
> > as root. Now I have ecrm1095.tfm in there.
>
> Only my quick investigation;
>
> * /var/spool/texmf was not used in tetex of sid(unstable) at least.
> It is moved to /var/cash/fonts already (tetex-bin 1.0.7+20011202-8)
> because this conforms to the FHS. Which version did you use?
I do not know what version Junichi's autobuilder uses, and I have some
updates since I used it, but these are on my machine:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii tetex-extra 1.0.2+20011202 extra teTeX library files
ii tetex-bin 1.0.7+20011202 teTeX binary files
ii debhelper 4.0.2 helper programs for debian/rules
ii debiandoc-sgml 1.1.72 DebianDoc SGML DTD and formatting tools
sf@goofy:ec$ apt-cache policy tetex-extra
tetex-extra:
Installed: 1.0.2+20011202-2
Candidate: 1.0.2+20011202-2
Package Pin: 1.0.2+20011202-2
Version Table:
1.0.2+20011202-3 1100
800 http://http.us.debian.org testing/main Packages
70 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
*** 1.0.2+20011202-2 1100
500 http://http.us.debian.org stable/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
It looks like I was lazy but I thought Junichi uses testing or unstable to
build package. Oh, I have "TEXMFCNF=texmf/" set. In my texmf/texmf.cnf
contains:
texmf.cnf:TFMFONTS = .;{$TEXMF/fonts,$VARTEXFONTS}/tfm//
texmf.cnf:OFMFONTS = .;{$TEXMF/fonts,$VARTEXFONTS}/{ofm,tfm}//;$TFMFONTS
Is this problem?
> * You might need tetex-extra for EC fonts.
> (Or you might need teTeX beta which we prepare to package.)
I have :
Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), debiandoc-sgml(>= 1.1.67), tetex-bin, tetex-extra
> Best regrads, 2002.10.31
Thanks for quick reply.
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
: :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
`. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract
Reply to: