Re: Possible mass filing of bugs, take #2.1

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Possible mass filing of bugs, take #2.1
From: Florian Weimer <Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 21:39:22 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87bs7x2uc5.fsf@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020820193243.GB22984@azure.humbug.org.au> (Anthony Towns's message of "Wed, 21 Aug 2002 05:32:43 +1000")
References: <[🔎] 20020820171139.GB6300@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <[🔎] XFMail.20020820102329.shalehperry@attbi.com> <[🔎] 20020820193243.GB22984@azure.humbug.org.au>

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> Things like libdb1 compliance, usage of nice(2), statistics for debhelper
> versus debstd usage, are all better collected by lintian.debian.org than
> by separate scripts.

Input for a database of historical MD5 hashes of individual files
would be nice, too.


-- 
Florian Weimer 	                  Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE
University of Stuttgart           http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/
RUS-CERT                          fax +49-711-685-5898

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Possible mass filing of bugs, take #2.1
  - From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>
- Re: Possible mass filing of bugs, take #2.1
  - From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@attbi.com>
- Re: Possible mass filing of bugs, take #2.1
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Possible mass filing of bugs, take #2.1
Next by Date: Re: png2/3 problem apparently successfully solved with -Bsymbolic
Previous by thread: Re: Possible mass filing of bugs, take #2.1
Next by thread: Re: Possible mass filing of bugs, take #2.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread