[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GCC 3.2 transition



vorlon@netexpress.net (Steve Langasek)  wrote on 16.08.02 in <[🔎] 20020816161748.GC5568@netexpress.net>:

> From the heated discussion I've just had on IRC, I've gathered the
> following:
>
> * It is assumed that for the vast majority of C++ libs we ship, upstream
>   has already transitioned to using the GCC 3.2 ABI, therefore our
>   current packages are already binary-incompatible with the rest of the
>   world. (ok)

Is this maybe "will already have ... when we release"?

Because otherwise, this is obvious nonsense. 3.2 was released *yesterday*.  
I am pretty certain 99% of all upstreams haven't even realized yet that  
3.2 exists. *No* distribution currently ships with 3.2.[1]

Our current packages may or may not be incompatible, but not for this  
reason.

[1] From the gcc list, IIRC several distributions were planning on  
shipping with 3.2 end of August or September. That was one of the  
arguments for creating 3.2.

MfG Kai



Reply to: