Re: possible start of mass bug reports (was: libtool cruft in .la files in /usr/lib)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: possible start of mass bug reports (was: libtool cruft in .la files in /usr/lib)
From: Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>
Date: 10 Jul 2002 16:54:33 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 8765zneiqe.fsf@falcon.wanadoo.fr>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020710113847.GA30783@zombie.inka.de>
References: <20020701160758.GC13058@falerio.students.cs.unibo.it> <[🔎] 20020710074059.GA10614@zombie.inka.de> <[🔎] 20020710113847.GA30783@zombie.inka.de>

>> "EB" == Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de> writes:

[...]

> Some more sorting tells: 131 binary packages are affected, build from 83
> source packages:

[...]

>  librep

Fixed in 0.16.1-2

Xhristian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- possible start of mass bug reports (was: libtool cruft in .la files in /usr/lib)
  - From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
- Re: possible start of mass bug reports (was: libtool cruft in .la files in /usr/lib)
  - From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: possible start of mass bug reports (was: libtool cruft in .la files in /usr/lib)
Next by Date: Re: A problem with Packages? Or is it not?
Previous by thread: Re: possible start of mass bug reports (was: libtool cruft in .la files in /usr/lib)
Next by thread: Re: possible start of mass bug reports (was: libtool cruft in .la files in /usr/lib)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread