Re: Letting google index the BTS?
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Roland Mas wrote:
> Adam Heath (2002-05-30 11:17:16 -0500) :
>
> > Also, I've considered implementing a cache. By this, I mean when
> > pkgrepot.cgi/bugreport.cgi generate html, they would save it
> > somewhere. Then, when a new request comes in, some timestamp
> > comparison would be done, and it would serve the saved static page,
> > if nothing had been updated.
> >
> > The above is made complex because of helper files like Maintainers
> > and Sources.
>
> Sounds like a job for Make. You'll end up with a rather large
> Makefile (or lots of small ones including each other), but it's
> doable. I investigated that solution for a large website I have to
> maintain at work (would have involved some 200k files), and found no
> problems with it (even if it's not the solutionthat was eventually
> chosen).
Make means statting. Statting is slow.
My dynamic index generator reads a 'log' of sorts produced by the debbugs
incoming cleaner. It then only processes those files.
I've done the makefile/postgres db thing for a website before. The makefile
wasn't large at all, as it generated a makefile fragment by running a database
query.
But I will consider it, at least.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: