Robert van der Meulen wrote: > As for kernel-patch-int; i'm offering it in case there are people > who need this. In my opinion it should be removed, and replaced with > cryptoapi (which i ITP'd a while ago; orphaning these will probably > give me the opportunity to finally upload it :) ). The newest cryptoapi incarnation seems to be back at kernel-patching, though. > The format of volumes encrypted by kernel-patch-int and cryptoapi > differs, and kernel-patch-int volumes will not be usable by > cryptoapi. If you're alluding to the iv changes, that is not true. At least I could get at data on a CDROM crypted under the old scheme after burning a few black candles. So keeping the old kerneli patch around may be unnecessary. -- Robbe
Attachment:
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature