Re: Package descriptions/ITPs [Was: Bug#148319: ITP: unreal-ircd]
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 10:53 am, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> In general I would suggest that people should avoid making any
> comments about stability/quality in package descriptions; try to keep
> them objective and opinion-free, please.
Unless of course the software is in a beta or non-production quality state,
in which case the packager has a duty to mention this. "This package does not
suck" or "this package does what may reasonably be expected of an IRC daemon"
is not worthy of description space, I agree.
> [1] All software has security holes. Without exception.
s/software/non-trivial software/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: